When character is connected | When character is not connected |
---|---|
The FAS will usually decide that there is a connection between the applicant or victim’s character, behaviour, attitude or criminal history and the violent act when they:
| The FAS will usually decide that there is no connection between the applicant or victim’s character, behaviour, attitude or criminal history and the violent act when they:
|
✅ Character is not connected to the violent act Example: Jasmin applied for financial assistance after being sexually assaulted. Jasmin has been homeless for many years and has occasionally worked as a sex worker. Jasmin has criminal convictions including for theft and drug possession. These convictions are not relevant to Jasmin’s application for assistance because Jasmin’s drug use and theft convictions are not connected to the violent act and will not be considered by the FAS. |
❌ Character impacts the outcome Example: Tyler has no history of violence or criminal behaviour, but one night he initiated a fight that left him and several bystanders seriously injured. In addition to causing injury to the other bystanders, Tyler suffered injuries requiring hospitalisation and ongoing medical treatment, as well as PTSD requiring ongoing counselling. Due to the physical and mental impact of the assault, Tyler was unable to work. The FAS decides that Tyler’s behaviour and criminal activity is relevant as he initiated the fight, which had a considerable impact on several other victims and witnesses present. |
Updated